Why does Long Yongtu "waste up" the Chinese auto industry?


What is globalization? Under the conditions of globalization, how has China's auto industry developed?

At the Huadu Automobile Forum recently held, Long Yongtu, who was once the head of the WTO negotiations, gave us an answer: In the next few years, there may be only five or six big car manufacturers in the world. If we can put the last The five or six big automakers are attracted to settle in China. I think it is the victory of the Chinese auto industry. It is not necessary for us to come up with a Chinese brand ourselves. It is the victory of our Chinese auto industry.

Long Yongtu stressed: We do not have to deliberately pursue China's own auto brands! I don't believe in any of the independent brands. I don't think I should spend too much effort on this issue. <<<<< How do you evaluate Long Yongtu's point of view?

His reason is: After globalization, there is only one globally-produced company. You can't say that this automobile factory is American, that factory is Japan; there can be no American brand, nor can there be a Japanese brand. Of course, it is impossible to have a completely Chinese brand.

After globalization, the source of funds for enterprises has become less important. After China’s banks have become a large joint venture bank, it is hard to say which country’s investment is to invest in the funds of Chinese companies. Therefore, no matter what its source of funding, any enterprise needs to create job opportunities for China, so long as it pays taxes to the Chinese government, it is a good enterprise.

According to Long Yongtu’s view, globalization will first of all have to dismantle its own national automobile industry. From then on, will the Chinese automobile industry put swords and guns into the warehouse to put Nanshan?

If so?

of course not!

one

According to Long Yongtu, what is the Chinese auto industry still doing? Just focus on soliciting.

We do not deny that the international auto industry has a few big and small structures. The Chinese auto industry is currently trying to shake up this pattern and it is indeed ineffective. However, the lack of strength is not the reason for our self-destruction! On the contrary, it is precisely because our strength is not catching up that we should work harder.

Why should the auto industry be open? At the time of the WTO negotiations, we were told that opening up was to enhance the competitiveness of the Chinese auto industry. Now Long Yongtu tells us that we should not compete, let the venue be given to others! I can't help but ask: Did Long Yongtu think so at the beginning? If so, we have found the reason why China's auto industry is weak and has no backbone. <<<<< How do you evaluate Long Yongtu's point of view?

China’s lack of strength now does not mean that it will never have strength. According to Long Yongtu’s idea, China cannot have strength. Don't say how to try hard, you can even think about it. If there is no big wish on the chest, how can the nation without ideals come to the fore? However, Long Yongtu can't think of it. China's auto industry is not unmanned, and there are always people who are unwilling to give up.

Moreover, the pattern of the international automobile industry is not irreversible. To have his ambition to replace it! Why does South Korea's auto industry get its way out of the cracks?

He Guangyuan said: The Chinese auto industry has been introducing advanced manufacturing technologies through joint ventures for more than 20 years. However, the technical knowledge brought about through joint venture production has turned into Chinese companies' capabilities in product development. It requires Chinese companies' own learning and innovation. In order for the Chinese auto industry to go to the international market, it is necessary not only to have a strategic vision, but also to have a sense of innovation and innovation.

Long Yongtu asked us to give up the position.


two

What is a brand?

Brand is value, and brand is benefit. There are countless examples of Chinese products that cannot be sold without price because of lack of brand. Long Yongtu should feel empathy when he is a minister.

Now, Long Yongtu wants us to give up our efforts to master the independent ownership of core technologies through innovation under the conditions of joint ventures. Of course, this product is not even meaningful if it is named Cuihua. <<<<< How do you evaluate Long Yongtu's point of view?

In the age of globalization, the production of the automobile industry is indeed global. The components of a car may come from many countries. But even so, the brand has not lost its national identity, and it has not disappeared, but it has been strengthened. Even if we haven't mastered the core technology yet, the brand itself has its own reason to exist independently, because it is also valuable.

Different brands are behind different cultures and represent different values. If the brand is not important, why does Mercedes do not change its name to Cuihua? BMW does not rename tiger girl? Why not use the Great Wall and the Forbidden City as a sign?

Globalization is an opportunity for the Chinese auto industry. It is an opportunity to develop and expand its own opportunities instead of canceling oneself. Through globalization, we have at least an opportunity to cooperate with foreign companies to improve our management and technology and improve Our level of knowledge. With such a foundation, we can improve our ability to independently develop and launch our own banner.

And Long Yongtu wants us to give up the banner.

three

Regardless of the common-sense problem of whether banks' loans to enterprises are indistinguishable from their nationality after the bank’s joint venture, the issue of whether the source of funding is important is single.



Foreign investment of a company can indeed ignore the source of its funding, because as long as the money is invested from the company's hands, whether it is a loan, its own funds, or the money it has received, it can be seen as the company's money. As long as money comes in it's fine. This is probably what many people will have. I once thought so, but the facts have told me, and can not be so naive! Nothing can be done with money, nor is it possible for anyone to have a history of money. For example, Americans think differently from Long Yongtu. CNOOC acquired Unocal. Americans do not want our money. Reasons: First, this is China’s money, and China is not a market economy country. Therefore, it is difficult for the money to be taken off the government. This is to add ideology to the money. Second, this money may come in and out of the energy market in the United States and may threaten US national security. This is enough to show that even if the United States has a highly developed market economy, it still needs to ask who the money is. What motive it has and whether it is beneficial to us or not. Otherwise, they may be sold, and they are still busy with the amount of money!

According to Long Yongtu, when we joined the WTO, there was no need to insist on insisting on a 50% joint-venture ratio. Because the money is indistinguishable, what's the point? We often say that the West is a capitalist country. What is capitalism? To put it bluntly, that is, whoever you use for money will have to listen to what you say. Capital is to speak, it is necessary to grasp the control, and it is to be rewarded. We also have a 50% stake, but how much rights do we have? Adding knowledge and knowledge to foreigners' capitals has given us a cure. We have no alternative but to listen. The only possibility of letting foreign capitals to let go is to let Long Yongtu tell them: "You don't know who your money is. Why do you want to control us?" <<<<< How do you evaluate Long Yongtu's point of view?

We can no matter where the investment comes from, but it cannot be said by Long Yongtu that as long as he brings in employment, the tax can be paid. Employment and taxation are only a trivial part of the benefits that foreign capital gains because of capital and knowledge. If we are satisfied with the status quo, then we will always be downstream, and we will always have a time to pick up people's teeth. In the event of a divestment, our car factory will not be in ruins.

Hydraulic Floor Jack

Manual Chain Hoist,Electric Chain Hoist Co., Ltd. , http://www.chropehoist.com

Posted on