The world's major industrial powers have their own high-level instrumentation industry. Sooner or later, China will become an industrially advanced country. How to develop its instrumentation industry is a very important issue.
Divided by capital and technology sources, the development of instrumentation industry in the world is nothing more than two modes: one is based on domestic capital and technology, and the other is on foreign capital and its technology. Industrial developed countries are generally the first model, and developing countries are often limited to the second mode, and their typical model is Singapore.
There are two ways to develop the instrumentation industry: one is to develop the road based on domestic companies, and the other is to cooperate with multinational corporations first, to give up part of the market, use its funds, learn its technology and management, and gradually increase the number of conditions when it becomes available. The road to the strength of domestic companies. Developing countries, represented by the “Four Little Dragonsâ€, want to take the second road, but have not yet achieved significant success. In a sense, Japan’s instrumentation industry has taken the second road in a certain range in the early stages, using The two models have achieved certain results. A Japanese company is mainly based on its own funds, particularly on the basis of learning and introducing foreign technologies, developing its own core technologies and becoming a world-famous company for instrumentation and control systems. Capital and foreign technology started. When the technology is mastered to a certain extent, the use of domestic financial capital forces has become Japan's top instrument companies. It can be said that the development of the Japanese instrumentation industry is taking the first road based on domestic companies, but not Less used is the second way of foreign technology and funding.
It is a very worthwhile issue to study whether China should become a country with a well-developed instrumentation industry. As a China-based instrumentation industry that already has a fairly large industry base, like Singapore, taking the road of fully cooperation with multinational companies is neither necessary nor feasible. However, from the practice of reform and opening up over the past 20 years, it has been taught that simply taking the original development model, the road that completely followed the first 20 years has achieved certain results, but it is not enough to shorten the gap with the world instrumentation industry and change the Chinese instrumentation. The backwardness of the industry.
Divided by capital and technology sources, the development of instrumentation industry in the world is nothing more than two modes: one is based on domestic capital and technology, and the other is on foreign capital and its technology. Industrial developed countries are generally the first model, and developing countries are often limited to the second mode, and their typical model is Singapore.
There are two ways to develop the instrumentation industry: one is to develop the road based on domestic companies, and the other is to cooperate with multinational corporations first, to give up part of the market, use its funds, learn its technology and management, and gradually increase the number of conditions when it becomes available. The road to the strength of domestic companies. Developing countries, represented by the “Four Little Dragonsâ€, want to take the second road, but have not yet achieved significant success. In a sense, Japan’s instrumentation industry has taken the second road in a certain range in the early stages, using The two models have achieved certain results. A Japanese company is mainly based on its own funds, particularly on the basis of learning and introducing foreign technologies, developing its own core technologies and becoming a world-famous company for instrumentation and control systems. Capital and foreign technology started. When the technology is mastered to a certain extent, the use of domestic financial capital forces has become Japan's top instrument companies. It can be said that the development of the Japanese instrumentation industry is taking the first road based on domestic companies, but not Less used is the second way of foreign technology and funding.
It is a very worthwhile issue to study whether China should become a country with a well-developed instrumentation industry. As a China-based instrumentation industry that already has a fairly large industry base, like Singapore, taking the road of fully cooperation with multinational companies is neither necessary nor feasible. However, from the practice of reform and opening up over the past 20 years, it has been taught that simply taking the original development model, the road that completely followed the first 20 years has achieved certain results, but it is not enough to shorten the gap with the world instrumentation industry and change the Chinese instrumentation. The backwardness of the industry.