In the first half of 2016, the LED industry patent "torture" war

It is understood that the LED product models infringed by this light are "BN-D4242J-A3" and "BN-D4242E-A3" and other infrared LED chips, which are infringed by the crystal electric power plant, including Taiwan invention No. 141155, No. 170789, 4 invention patents such as No. 202662 and No. I283031. Looking back at the first half of 2016, there were frequent patent litigation cases in the LED industry, and the patent warfare has become one of the keynotes of the entire industry. Below, Xiaobian takes everyone to see what are the main patent disputes in the first half of 2016. Jingyuan Optoelectronics Controls Optical Technology Infringement of Invention Patent On January 8, 2016, Jingyuan Optoelectronics officially filed a lawsuit against the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court, suing Guangsheng Technology for infringing four invention patents owned by Jingyuan Optoelectronics. It is understood that the LED product models infringed by this light are "BN-D4242J-A3" and "BN-D4242E-A3" and other infrared LED chips, which are infringed by the crystal electric power plant, including Taiwan invention No. 141155, No. 170789, 4 invention patents such as No. 202662 and No. I283031. Hongqi counterattacks the patent infringement of Cree. On January 26, 2016, LED Taiwan factory Hongqi Technology sued the US LED manufacturer CREE for infringing a patent in the US District Court for Northern California, the white LED related The patent number is US 6,841,934. So far, the litigation of both parties is still in progress, and Hong Qi is cautiously optimistic about the progress of the litigation. Previously, Cree launched a patent lawsuit against Taiwanese Hongqi on September 15, 2014. Hongqi immediately launched a counterattack, not only in the US on December 5, 2014, in the United States accused Cree and its subsidiaries infringement of patent rights, and in 2015 In July, in the legal offensive and defensive occasions, the relevant Chinese patents of Cree were successfully invalidated. Nichia wins patent litigation in the United States, Yiguang was convicted of infringement On January 25, 2016, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas determined that Everlight Electronics and its US subsidiary Everlight Americas, Inc. infringed three patents in Japan. U.S. Patent No. 8, 530,250, U.S. Patent No. 7,432,589, U.S. Patent No. 7,462,870. The lawsuit has gone through two years of trial. In September 2013, Nichia Chemical filed a lawsuit against the US East Texas District Court against Yiguang, and its US subsidiary infringed on three patents of Nichia Chemical. Nichia also filed another lawsuit in November of the same year. On the 25th of 2016, the US District Court of East Texas confirmed that Everlight had infringed on three patents owned by Nichia Chemical Co., Ltd., and also rejected the infringement of the patents filed by the three companies. Nichia also pursued the victory and filed an appeal against the injunction on February 16, 2016. In the United States, Yiguang won the award of the important patent victory in the United States on January 28, LED light factory Everlight said In 2012, Yiguang filed the US patents US5,998,925 and US7,531,960 owned by Nichia, a Japanese manufacturer, in the Eastern District of Michigan, and the two patents were invalid and Yiguang did not infringe. The claim. The two patents are also important, namely YAG phosphors for LEDs, and patents related to phosphor concentration. Yiguang pointed out that the latest judgment of the District Court of the Eastern District of Michigan was received on January 19, 2016. The court has rejected Japan’s request for retrial, following the jury’s decision on April 22, 2015. Afterwards, it was confirmed that the rights claimed by Nichia were all invalid, and Yiguang affirmed this victory. Nichia announced that it was in China, requesting a permanent injunction and damages. On March 4, 3016, Nichia was suing in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court in Beijing for the prosecution of Everlight Electronics (China) Co., Ltd., a Chinese subsidiary of Everlight Electronics (2393), and Yiguang's authorized dealer Beijing Ducheng Yiguang Electronic Device Sales Center requested a permanent injunction and damages. It is reported that Nichia is based on two YAG-related patents in this lawsuit: Chinese invention patent number 97196762.8 (patent 762) and Chinese invention patent number 200610095837.4 (patent 837), claiming that the defendant sold LED products in China, including products. Models 334-15/T1C1-4VXC-L (ES) and 67-21 UMC/S3031/TR8/LT infringe the 762 patent and the 837 patent, while the product model 67-21S/KK2C-H6565M41N42936Z6/2T infringes the 762 patent. Yiguang also responded to the accusations of Nichia Chemical, saying that China's 762 patent and No. 837 patent are one of Nichia's white LED patent families, but Yiguang firmly believes that the two Chinese patents are invalid, so it will assist dealers to counterattack. Seoul Viosys filed UV patent infringement lawsuit against US court On March 18, 2016, Seoul's Viosys, the world's leading UV LED solution provider, sued Florida's UV application product manufacturer Salon Supply Store (Salon) for infringement of its UV LED Related patents. It is reported that the related patents infringed by Salon involve UVLED manufacturing process and application fields, including EPI technology, FAB technology, component packaging technology and curing technology. The US Salon company sells related infringing products through large online shopping platforms such as Amazon and eBay, and has made huge profits. Nichia in the United States to sue Vizio LCD TV brand patent infringement March 21, 2016, Japan's LED giant Nichia Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. filed a lawsuit against the US East Texas State Federal District Court against the US LCD TV brand Vizio for infringing its US patent US8, 530,250, and on March 24, filed a lawsuit against the US Central California District Court against Vizio for infringing four patents of Nichia Chemical, including "US7,855,092", "US7,901,959", "US7,915,631" US8,309,375" requested the court to issue a permanent injunction and award damages. According to the US legal media, Vizio's LCD TV products have LED backlight modules used by Taiwanese manufacturers. The LED chip products used in them have been identified as infringing products by Nichia, so they sued the LCD TV factory. Enplas infringes Seoul's LED backlight patents for more than 26.4 million. On March 24, 2016, the California federal judge ruled that Japanese manufacturer Enplas was deliberately infringing the patents of Seoul's semiconductor LED backlights. The judge also agreed that the Seoul Semiconductor patent was valid and rejected the patent invalidation statement claimed by Enplas. The judge also sentenced Seoul Semiconductor to receive a loss of US$4.07 million (equivalent to approximately RMB 26.4 million). It is reported that this patent involves 6,473,554 (patent 554) small-volume lighting devices and 6,007,209 (patent 209) to provide backlight source. Patent No. 209 is related to notebook computer LED backlight applications. Hilde applied for Mitsubishi LED red powder patent invalidation was rejected on April 21, 2016, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation and National Research and Development Corporation Material Materials Research Institute announced that on July 2, 2015, China Yantai Hilde New Materials Co., Ltd. Chinese patents (Chinese Patent No. ZL200480040967.7, No. ZL200710199440.4 and No. ZL201110066517.7, which are widely used for MCC and NIMS, which are widely used for LEDs, are hereinafter referred to as this patent (Note 1) The request for invalidation to the Patent Reexamination Board was received on April 7, 2016. The committee completely rejected Hilde's claim and maintained the validity of this patent.

Chemical Matting Hardener

Application:

Matting Agent with other ingredients, and then extrude them together.The dosage of matting agent is 5~8% of resins, suitable for matt finishes with 30~60% gloss (60°).The gloss level is also interrelated to the resins chosen.It is not recommend to use matting agent for black or other dark color finishes.


Our Advantage & Service:
-Technical Support Online Service Provided


According to customer's requirement, we provide layout (plant designer), excellent mechanical engineer, excellent electrician, etc.


-On-site Training Service Provided


In customer factory, we provide all kinds of training, including installation, commissioning


-Long-term Maintenance Provided


In the area of maintenance, we offer needs-oriented and standardized maintenance packages, such as the overhaul of components, gearboxes, in order to guarantee the safe and economic operation of plant and machinery.


-Spare Parts Replacement and Repair Service Provided


Providing spare parts for all kinds of powder coating processing equipment in long-term. And can provide tailored made spare parts according to customers' requirements. Ensure advanced craft, good material and high precision.


-Formulation Provided (our advantage)


Some customers are worried their final products if can get best result, we have our own formulator (Engineer for powder coating formulation) who is testing and updating the formulation according to customer requirement all the time. And have very good experience for the formulation to support customer to make different effect powder coatings.

Powder Coating Mattging Hardener,Powder Coating Outdoor Matting Agent,Powder Coating Indoor Matting Agent,Powder Coating Chemical Matting Agent

Yantai Yuanli Corp Ltd , https://www.yuanlicorpcn.com

Posted on